Either it’s writing your thesis or the research paper, the first and foremost requirement is of developing the research proposal. It is the core document that responsibly states the identified research problem, exhibits the research objectives and questions, and highlights the methods that will be engaged for the performance of the research.

However, for all these critical concerns, one has to retain while developing the research proposal, the main questions are what is meant by reliability; why it is the effective attribute of the research proposal; or how one can know that reliability is established or which type of reliability to be the part of my research proposal.

Here, we are for your help, resolving all of your concerns associated with integrating and maintaining the reliability aspect in your research paper. For further help, do remember, we are only one click away from here. Now, let’s begin to solve your queries and deliver an extensive understanding of the reliability factor in your research proposal;

The Significant Concept of Reliability

The element of strategy or I would express it as the strategy has to be maintained in the research proposal and then carried forward in the entire research performance, beginning from the defining and explaining of the research problem, drafting the past gaps, criticisms, data assemblage, calculating, and articulating of the results. The deliberate purpose of maintaining reliability is associated with retaining the effectiveness and interest of the persuasive document. It depicts precision, future strengths, and mainly the stability in the presented issue and the professionalism for investing the efforts to solve the matter. Consecutively, the two of the important factors one has to integrate into the research as the essence of reflecting reliability are some of the standard conditions and the applicability of the authentic and approved methods. Let’s discuss them;

Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Place Your Order Now!

Standardized Conditions of Reliability

While writing the research proposal, it is the common practice to search for related past research papers, or else consider the area of interest in which the issues or the challenges are also defined. However, either of the cases has the major expectation of getting distractions. The criticality is it creates dissimilarity stages following the end stage of the research. Thus, the key is to be specific and ensure that only authentic information is collected and included in the research proposal. Also, when you highlight one of the core problems, stick to it and extend your discussion around it, such as including various strategies, factors of consideration, etc. It is referred to as keeping the conditions aligned and reliable as far as possible.

Applicable Reliable Method

While performing a research proposal or the extended research project the applicability of the method means, aligning the structure in an organised manner. There are multiple steps integrated into the research performance and research articulation; however, each one is connected to the other, acting as the prerequisites. Thus follow the steps and keep your discussion in the selected dimension. This gives reliability to the research, as each stage or the chapter involved is interconnected.

Why Ensuring Reliability in the Research is Adequate

The research proposal is not simply documented that on acceptance will be ended. Academically, it holds significant value; such as that at the Ph.D. level, the research paper is responsible for delivering the social solution for the highlighted problem, discussing the associated factors practically. Thus, reliability means something crucial for the research, and ensuring its exhibition is the research is of utmost importance of adequate findings and also generating a substantial impact on your grades.

Types of Reliability

Students often get confused that reliability only matters when the stage of methodology writing, collection, and analysis of the data occurs, as it includes the use of adequate methods, tests, or the statistical software, for which there should be no vagueness to be practiced. However, you should consider it as a myth. The reason is reliability is reflected through the wide range of the activities performed for developing the research proposal and step by step levels articulated in the research, each activity, and the written notion depicts the certain level of reliability. Moving forward, we present you with the types of reliability, developing an understanding for you to integrate the essence of reliability in your research proposals.

Stability Reliability

The stability reliability is said to be used when the specific test is recapped, consisting of a similar matter; however, its determination is set to the future dates, in order to determine the stability of the research project. Based on its description, it is also referred to as re-test reliability. For example, testing customer satisfaction level during the purchase and testing consumer level after the use of the particular product is the same matter; yet, the test is shifted to the future paradigm, when the experience is generated. Similarly, when medical groups test the newly form drugs, the approvals of no side effects are kept hidden, until and unless a certain batch is consumed and there are observations; thus, the outcomes remain connected to the singular object; achieving reliability.

Equivalency Reliability

It is described as the integration of the two contents, responsible for measuring the same concept, provided with an equivalent level of difficulty. Usually, this kind of reliability is highlighted when there is the requirement of analyzing the relatability or association between the two groups. These are often represented in experiment-based researches that involve quantitative measures. Such as when the statistical test is used the variable ‘r’ represents the correlation between the independent and dependent variables. However, the reliability is achieved when there is further research for achieving the conclusive efforts, i.e. exhibiting the effects on the dependent variable. For example, the researcher focus on observing the two distinct patterns in the students, as preparing for the mid-terms, while the sports competition is also near. Analyzing the focus, determination, and preference of the students, it is highlighted that their poor equivalency reliability between the two activities, as it is a matter of personal interest.

Interrater Reliability

It is the stance in which two or more entities appear to agree. Mostly, it is related to the implementation of the test or the scoring grid. For example, while searching for the past research papers, you will find the similarity in the findings, either quantitatively or qualitatively. It is not because the research is copied, it is the interrater reliability in terms of the model or the test application, appearing to be similar. For example, analyzing the internal environment and significance of the organization, if the SWOT Analysis framework is used, then one can find multiple pieces of research having similar findings, only if the framework is implemented in a similar strategic manner.

Internal Consistency Reliability

It is the type of reliability in which the tests and the procedures are further used for specifying similar skills and the quality. It can also be considered as an accuracy check of the calculated results. It mainly happens, when the researcher seeks further evaluations, identifying the similar characteristics through correlative testing of the variables.

The Difference between Reliability and Validity

Students often perceive reliability and validity in the research performance are similar. However, there is a significant difference that one should understand. When it is said that the research proposal should include the reliability attributes, then it means the consistency to be incorporated in writing or measuring. On the other hand, validity is referred to the accuracy of the measures. The reliability appears when the existing results can be represented under similar conditions. While validity is experienced when the results are scrutinized in the context of representing what they were supposed to measure. For example, performing research on consumer behavior satisfactory levels, the results are analyzed addressing that have achieved the expected level, i.e. either the test or the interpretation is delivering adequate answers, then it is referred to as achieving the validity margin. While, when similar data is used implementing the similar test and maintaining the similar conditions, there is the expectation of similar results as of the previous research. If the similarity exists, then reliability is achieved.

Establishment of Reliability and How to Address it

Till now we have covered a substantial understanding of the reliability facets that need to be included within the research proposal. Perhaps, if any of you are still left with the percentage of complexity, we now present you with the establishment of reliability and how you can address it in your research proposal and research project in the future. In the research performance, there is the repetition of the test in two or more different occasions or settings. For example, students observing five patients with certain diseases the results will be the same, either the test is performed in the morning or the night, in a similar setting. As the diagnosis of the disease, will not change, if the test is performed in the morning. This is referred to as the establishment of reliability. Certainly, if the student is running the statistical test, involving age demographics and consumer behavioral preferences, keeping other factors constant or similar, then the results will always be the same, declaring the reliability of the research.

Get Assistance From Our PhD Experts

Are You Worried about your studies? Contact Our Professionals Now to get your Assignment Completed.

Get 20% Discount Now!!

Both are Essential for Research – Reliability and Validity

As we have understood the effectiveness of reliability in the research and learned the differences between validity and reliability, it does not mean that only one of the variables has to be reflected in the research. For further clarification, reliability is referred to the stance that declares the trustworthiness of the strategy or the test generated score; while, validity is referred to the significance of the strategy or the test in that particular situation. Also, the declaration of reliability is necessary to obtain validity. You cannot state that the research conclusions are valid, without specifying that the test scores calculated are reliable. Thus, one cannot perform the research simply declaring that the strategies or the test implemented, presented the valid conclusion, without first verifying that the test or the specific approach implemented in the research is reliable.

Overall, we have learned the importance of reliability, as the means of consistency to be maintained in the entire research performance, associated with each of the approaches, strategies, or test mechanism used in the research. Just for your revision, the purpose of research in which testing of hypothesis or the predicted aims have to be justified, the essence of reliability claims that the results are authentic, instead of declaring them as the possible extremes or the personal preferences and opinions.

This is all about the reliability significance one can understand regarding the reliability in the research performance, along with its major types and credibility.

However, in case you still need help from professionals in designing your research proposal, you are one click away to access the expert point of research development, presenting you with reliable and valid research proposals and research project developments.

Leave a Comment


No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *